| Charles Schaefer on Wed, 26 Nov 2008 16:32:43 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: [s-d] [s-b] Paranoid |
2008/11/26, Sgeo sgeoster@xxxxxxxxx: > > > Hm.. perhaps maybe Rules could have numbers but proposals specifying > specific rules to amend/repeal cannot refer to those numbers? How about we all just be more careful in drafting and voting on proposals? I know this may come as a shock to some of us, but not every solution to every problem involves a ruleset fix. PS: I'll admit, I voted for p515, I'm very sorry, and it will never happen again. (Unless we start the proposal numbering over again) _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss