Re: [s-d] [s-b] Paranoid

[Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

ehird wrote:

> On 26 Nov 2008, at 20:08, Ed Murphy wrote:
> 
>> I'm too busy to worry about breakage as extensive as what has recently
>> come to light, hence my support for j's RP (repealed elements can then
>> be carefully reviewed and re-added on an individual basis).
> 
> You know, that's _exactly_ how me and teucer constructed ours.

Carefully reviewed /by the players generally/, I mean.  I assume that
your RP is at least mostly decent, but by addressing everything at
once, it tripped my tl;dr filter.

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss