Re: [s-d] [s-b] (no subject)

["Craig Daniel" <teucer@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 9:40 PM, Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Waldo Cheerio wrote:
>
>> I become a player, name of "Monstrou".
>
> I submit the following consultation, naming teucer as the unbeliever:
>
>      Did Monstrou become a player on or about Tue, 18 Nov 2008
>      17:13:26 -0800?
>
> /* NO if e is a sock puppet for teucer or any other player, YES if
>   e is a friend of teucer's. */

He's an internet friend who I talked into it. Besides, I don't think I
even have any socks.

> I also submit the following consultation, naming teucer as the
> unbeliever:
>
>      Does Monstrou's consent constitute "Monstrous Consent" for
>      the purpose of Rule 4E88 and/or 5E88 (The Monster)?

This should produce a judgment which is the inverse of the judgment on
the consultation asking whether or not it is still Winday. If the two
judgments disagree on the matter, I shall be forced to declare
whichever comes in second to be inconsistent.

 - teucer
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss