Re: [s-d] [s-b] Again!

Jay Campbell on Mon, 17 Nov 2008 00:13:45 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Again!

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Again!
From: Jay Campbell <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 23:13:40 -0800
In-reply-to: <586BD829-3972-47BE-A47E-7CFFE408914C@xxxxxxxxx>
References: <37FA7C6E-0454-4570-95F2-D2F61C1DA0EF@xxxxxxxxx> <6bf32280811161408i7d135b4bs871cc6e68d37600c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <586BD829-3972-47BE-A47E-7CFFE408914C@xxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914)

>> Would you mind posting the Brainfuck code that generated this, so that
>> Ministers need not interpret this wordy English?
>>     

Lightweight.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Again!
  - From: comex
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Again!
  - From: Elliott Hird

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Repeal tomfoolery
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Antithesi
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Again!
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] DIS: No one said /I/ couldn't post this
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread