Re: [s-d] [s-b] Again!

Elliott Hird on Sun, 16 Nov 2008 16:32:44 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Again!

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Again!
From: Elliott Hird <penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 23:32:35 +0000
In-reply-to: <44e5a2650811161521g51e594fbhb955511110c6261c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <37FA7C6E-0454-4570-95F2-D2F61C1DA0EF@xxxxxxxxx> <6bf32280811161408i7d135b4bs871cc6e68d37600c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <586BD829-3972-47BE-A47E-7CFFE408914C@xxxxxxxxx> <4920A67D.3000508@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <0E067533-32F6-4D15-A880-B416BAE3E095@xxxxxxxxx> <44e5a2650811161521g51e594fbhb955511110c6261c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On 16 Nov 2008, at 23:21, Jamie Dallaire wrote:

> Ha nice :-) Though if you're thinking of a Transaction that'll fail  
> given
> that we can't determine with certainty whether it's true.

Nope, just obligating me to perform as a game action the output of a BF
program calculating that then printing an action. Platonically, I do it.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Again!
  - From: comex
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Again!
  - From: Elliott Hird
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Again!
  - From: Ed Murphy
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Again!
  - From: Elliott Hird
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Again!
  - From: Jamie Dallaire

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Again!
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] DIS: No one said /I/ couldn't post this
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Again!
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Again!
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread