Re: [s-d] [s-b] Infinite proposals

Craig Daniel on Sat, 15 Nov 2008 19:28:06 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Infinite proposals

To: "discussion list for B Nomic" <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Infinite proposals
From: "Craig Daniel" <teucer@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 21:27:55 -0500
In-reply-to: <dbedf4da0811151435u5cb13b76ob30c1c2529bd9f3c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <8B5D4EAC-C8E1-420D-839C-2F872B071899@xxxxxxxxx> <44e5a2650811151359o5b6d16d1tf01cfc5edff029c5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <6C5B7D93-D6CC-4E78-AED7-CD4BB0DFC609@xxxxxxxxx> <dbedf4da0811151435u5cb13b76ob30c1c2529bd9f3c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 5:35 PM, Tyler <wisety@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> You know, maybe Transactions can't submit themselves. I mean, if the Trans.
> succeeds, the game actions contained in them are supposed to happen as if
> they weren't in a Transaction, right? So any transactions that are based on
> themselves being transactions must fail.

I'm inclined to agree with this interpretation just to end the headacheness.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Infinite proposals
  - From: Jamie Dallaire
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Infinite proposals
  - From: Tyler

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] MoM reset
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] MoM reset
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Infinite proposals
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Enslavement?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread