Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: The Plague

["Jamie Dallaire" <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hmmm I do need to phrase that better. What I mean is that you go through
each plagued game object, one by one, and at each you take the square of its
virulence, and cause that many other game objects to become plagued.

The 10 more is to insure a baseline supply of plague. Otherwise, we could
just pay to off the initial plague reservoirs and completely eradicate the
problem in the first nweek.

BP

On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 1:44 AM, Taral <taralx@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 1:12 PM, Jamie Dallaire <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> > Then, for every Game Object that was Plagued at the start of the nweek
> > (even those which have just been destroyed by this Rule), a number of
> > randomly selected non-Plagued Game Objects, equal to the square of each
> > Plagued Game Object's Virulence, become Plagued. Then, the Virulence of
> > every Game Object is increased by one. Then, 10 more randomly selected
> Game
> > Objects become Plagued.
>
> What is this, the sum of the squares? The square of the sum? The
> square of the max? Why 10 more?
>
> --
> Taral <taralx@xxxxxxxxx>
> "Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you."
>    -- Unknown
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
>
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss