Re: [s-d] [s-b] That was a really awful refresh proposal tbqh

Craig Daniel on Wed, 22 Oct 2008 14:30:28 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] That was a really awful refresh proposal tbqh

To: "discussion list for B Nomic" <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] That was a really awful refresh proposal tbqh
From: "Craig Daniel" <teucer@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 17:30:20 -0400
In-reply-to: <6bf32280810221429n3f647b81l3da79b9fd819f573@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <6bf32280810221349o50d5158ck1b2b06eb879c6a42@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <55b258c20810221351y570da1a8qb9bf375a95d43848@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <55b258c20810221352t10655bb2x53a617c1986a23f4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <6bf32280810221429n3f647b81l3da79b9fd819f573@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 5:29 PM, comex <comexk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 4:52 PM, Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> I even do this on a public forum.
>
> But are you able to act on behalf of me just just because I agreed to
> a contract that says you can?

We're about to find out.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] That was a really awful refresh proposal tbqh
  - From: Craig Daniel
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] That was a really awful refresh proposal tbqh
  - From: comex

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] That was a really awful refresh proposal tbqh
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] That was a really awful refresh proposal tbqh
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] That was a really awful refresh proposal tbqh
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] That was a really awful refresh proposal tbqh
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread