Elliott Hird on Tue, 14 Oct 2008 15:25:19 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] Alelaelaelalealealealelaelaou |
On 14 Oct 2008, at 23:23, Jamie Dallaire wrote: > New strategy: > > Since Charles' actions, IF valid, would clearly break the game, I > suggest > civil disobedience. > > All obligations imposed on anyone by SCAM can only be enforced > through the > Courts, and Charles cannot unilaterally control the Courts. I move > that no > one convict any other party (save for, possibly, Charles) of > failing to > fulfill an obligation to SCAM. > > BP support'n dis -- ehird _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss