Elliott Hird on Tue, 14 Oct 2008 15:25:19 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Alelaelaelalealealealelaelaou


On 14 Oct 2008, at 23:23, Jamie Dallaire wrote:

> New strategy:
>
> Since Charles' actions, IF valid, would clearly break the game, I  
> suggest
> civil disobedience.
>
> All obligations imposed on anyone by SCAM can only be enforced  
> through the
> Courts, and Charles cannot unilaterally control the Courts. I move  
> that no
> one convict any other party (save for, possibly, Charles) of  
> failing to
> fulfill an obligation to SCAM.
>
> BP

support'n dis

-- 
ehird

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss