Re: [s-d] [s-b] Where precedents may differ / FREE MACKS

Pavitra on Tue, 14 Oct 2008 13:19:39 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Where precedents may differ / FREE MACKS

To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Where precedents may differ / FREE MACKS
From: Pavitra <celestialcognition@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 15:18:56 -0500
In-reply-to: <55b258c20810141306r3bec0147t35792a1f1fa56abc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <6bf32280810141254x3874373l2009cce2f71d3432@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <6bf32280810141255s17375214jd87ab3d021fd89d0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <55b258c20810141306r3bec0147t35792a1f1fa56abc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: KMail/1.9.9

On Tuesday 14 October 2008 03:06:26 pm Craig Daniel wrote:
> Then I raise
> the question of what the referent of the "me" in the contract
> actually is. I think it's comex, but I confess it's hard to tell.

Is that a Consultation, or a point of curiosity for s-d?
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Where precedents may differ / FREE MACKS
  - From: Craig Daniel

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Transactional timing
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Where precedents may differ / FREE MACKS
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Transactional timing
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Where precedents may differ / FREE MACKS
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread