Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: A less drastic fix... or a kludge?

Ed Murphy on Mon, 13 Oct 2008 12:56:37 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: A less drastic fix... or a kludge?

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: A less drastic fix... or a kludge?
From: Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 12:55:24 -0700
In-reply-to: <6bf32280810131246u3f817534iaf1814ad1c0d6e43@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <6bf32280810131057q15b9e494i6cf46b26e2e6dc5c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <48F39DF0.1060704@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <6bf32280810131246u3f817534iaf1814ad1c0d6e43@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.17) Gecko/20080914 Thunderbird/2.0.0.17 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0

comex wrote:

> The proposal would limit the obligation on Officers to Officers who
> are bound to the AoI.  Or am I missing something?

No, I missed that your proposal included the qualifier "who are bound
to its AoI".

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: A less drastic fix... or a kludge?
  - From: Ed Murphy
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: A less drastic fix... or a kludge?
  - From: comex

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: A less drastic fix... or a kludge?
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] A request for J, from the Agoran Registrar
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: A less drastic fix... or a kludge?
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation assignments
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread