Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: A less drastic fix... or a kludge?

[Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

comex wrote:

> Proposal: A less drastic fix... or a kludge?
> Conflicts: Enough already
> {{{
> Amend Rule 4E79 by replacing
> {
> Officer. Officers of a Corporation
> }
> with
> {
> Legal Entity bound to them as an Officer; they may optionally define
> other Officers, who need not be so bound.  The Officers of a
> Corporation who are bound to its Articles of Incorporation
> }
> }}}

This would still allow non-parties to be obligated to make the
corporation fulfill its obligations.  In particular, CPA could
be trivially reworded so that it was not obligated to do anything
with macks/socks already owned by Pirates.

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss