Re: [s-d] [s-b] Snag the Beast: teucer, Charles, Billy Pilgrim, ehird

Ed Murphy on Sun, 12 Oct 2008 07:00:13 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Snag the Beast: teucer, Charles, Billy Pilgrim, ehird

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Snag the Beast: teucer, Charles, Billy Pilgrim, ehird
From: Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 06:59:15 -0700
In-reply-to: <48F198EC.4040701@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <48F10B8B.8030207@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <44e5a2650810112321o7ca1bb3w7a2e2bee801cd9df@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <48F198EC.4040701@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.17) Gecko/20080914 Thunderbird/2.0.0.17 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0

Jay Campbell wrote:

> It would have put OCB under contractual control of whoever went along. 
> You're the #1 person I expected to object, of course.

The OCB would have been required to perform certain actions, but would
it have been able to perform them (apart from the standard mechanisms
happening to match up)?

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Snag the Beast: teucer, Charles, Billy Pilgrim, ehird
  - From: Jay Campbell

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Snag the Beast: teucer, Charles, Billy Pilgrim, ehird
  - From: Jay Campbell

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Snag the Beast: teucer, Charles, Billy Pilgrim, ehird
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Deus, qui corda fidelium Sancti Spiritus illustratione docuisti
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Snag the Beast: teucer, Charles, Billy Pilgrim, ehird
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Snag the Beast: teucer, Charles, Billy Pilgrim, ehird
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread