Jay Campbell on Sat, 11 Oct 2008 15:14:02 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] So long, and thanks for all the Fish! |
> oneself. "All ministries I can Usurp" does not describe a unique set > of targets for ehird's Usurp action. ehird cannot usurp the set of > all ministries with a Reward of less than m70; he can only usurp one > of 3 subsets of that set; which subset isn't specified. "I usurp each > Ministry I could afford to usurp before I posted this message" seems > closer to your interpretation, which might either fail or create a > 3-way split in gamestate (if I'm the Priest sorting it out, I'd say it > fails as being too vague, but the rules might be written poorly enough > to allow for either to be a reasonable interpretation of Doctrine), > but as written I'd say the action just fails to accurately describe a > valid target at all. > Agreed. Some sort of "in alphabetical order, I attempt to ..." clause would have worked. _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss