Re: [s-d] [s-b] C Nomic

Jay Campbell on Fri, 10 Oct 2008 11:09:05 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] C Nomic

To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] C Nomic
From: Jay Campbell <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 11:08:55 -0700
In-reply-to: <44e5a2650810100921r669d8ee0k3cc16500095941ca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <48EBD2EE.7000908@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <dbedf4da0810071452v38251457n43503f4e0a261bd4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <44e5a2650810100921r669d8ee0k3cc16500095941ca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914)

Holy snot, BP. Does this thesis count toward a degree?


Jamie Dallaire wrote:
>
> I urge everyone to read the below carefully, as it leads to an Oracularity
> concerning the fundamental nature of our game.
>   

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] C Nomic
  - From: Jamie Dallaire

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Not In Vain
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] C Nomic
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] C Nomic
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] C Nomic
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread