Jamie Dallaire on Tue, 7 Oct 2008 21:27:57 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Free C With Purchase of B


On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 12:23 AM, 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I revise the my unnumbered proposal "Free C With Purchase of B" to read:
> {
>      Upon passage of this proposal, the public displays of both B
> and C Nomic are ratified. Any changes that occurred in B Nomic in the
> previous nday that have not been explicitly updated in the Public
> display of both nomics, are retroactively simulated in both.
>
> Rule 4e83 is repealed in B Nomic.
> Rule 4e83 is repealed in C Nomic.
>
> }


How can B affect C like that (the last sentence)? Especially once the only
rule B has that ties their states together has been repealed in B?
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss