Jamie Dallaire on Tue, 7 Oct 2008 21:27:57 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Free C With Purchase of B |
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 12:23 AM, 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I revise the my unnumbered proposal "Free C With Purchase of B" to read: > { > Upon passage of this proposal, the public displays of both B > and C Nomic are ratified. Any changes that occurred in B Nomic in the > previous nday that have not been explicitly updated in the Public > display of both nomics, are retroactively simulated in both. > > Rule 4e83 is repealed in B Nomic. > Rule 4e83 is repealed in C Nomic. > > } How can B affect C like that (the last sentence)? Especially once the only rule B has that ties their states together has been repealed in B? _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss