Re: [s-d] [s-b] black corp what?

[Jay Campbell <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

None of the above. VFS(C) gets debited macks as VFS(B) gets those 
credited during the transfer, and VFS(B) gets a corresponding credit 
while VFS(C) gets a corresponding debit through B/C enslavement. That 
is, *if* VSS(C) has any macks to start with.

Any change of gamestate in C happens in B, but my belief is C was never 
populated. C Nomic contains:

- The Rules
- ais536 and any other players that registered after C's instantiation
- The sock corporations

... and a bunch of invalid, failed Game Actions that worked in B but 
can't in C because the target Game Objects don't exist.



Charles Schaefer wrote:
> 2008/10/6, Tyler <wisety@xxxxxxxxx>:
>   
>> Well, if we're going on the assumption that C Nomic isn't already full of
>> copies of the Objects in B Nomic, what if something is legal in one nomic
>> and illegal in another? Now that the business forum is a business forum for
>> both B and C nomic, I think I'll use it:
>>     
>
>
> I'm going to operate on another possible assumption: that C Nomic exists
> full of objects which are exact duplicates of their B Nomic counterparts.
>
> But first, regardless of what happens with my transaction, I transfer all of
> my mack to Votes For Sale, Inc.
>
> I submit the following transaction:
> START TRANSACTION
> The name of this game is C Nomic.
> I do the following action 100 times: As Da Boss, I cause Votes For Sale,
> Inc. (A C Nomic corporation) to transfer all of it's mack to Votes For Sale,
> Inc. (A B Nomic Corporation).
> FINISH TRANSACTION
>
> But why? Rule 4E83 says that "Any change to the gamestate of one of these
> nomics happens simultaneously in the other one."
>
> Scenario 1: Causing VFS (B Nomic Branch) to gain mack causes its C Nomic
> branch to gain the corresponding amount of mack. The transaction results in
> me multiplying my mack holdings by 2^100.
> Scenario 2: Causing VFS (B Nomic Branch) to lose mack causes its *C* Nomic
> branch to lose the corresponding amount of mack. I am now bankrupt (maybe
> the C Nomic Congress will bail me out for submitting a subprime
> transaction).
> Scenario 3: It cannot be determined how much mackerel I would have if this
> succeeds, therefore the transaction fails.
> Scenario 4: C Nomic never had any points, or a VFS corporation. The
> transaction fails.
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-business mailing list
> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
>   

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss