Jay Campbell on Sat, 4 Oct 2008 12:01:55 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] Inflationary Language |
> 4E70 DOES permit the creation of Game Documents (a type of Game ObjecT) by > Legal Entities. Corporations are Legal Entities, yes. I don't think 4E70 > REQUIRES Corporations to create Game Objects, however. Billy Pilgrim once > created a Game Document to start up BP First Bank of Switzerland. First Bank > had no role in the Document's creation. It was merely its spawn. > > Minor point: a Corporation can create other Corporation, and in doing so IS required to create a Game Document. > This all is just another instance of the > old "I Say I Did Therefore I Did" scam and ensuing discussion. Only this > time, we have an actual Rule there to block the scam. > > That said, I do plan to vote FOR the proposal to allow for Contract Objects > that are limited in scope to the inside of a Contract. > I'm still not convinced the hole is plugged and I appreciate your support of that proposal. I don't truly want to destroy B Corporations, this is all part of shoring up their structure. _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss