Re: [s-d] [s-b] BlackCorp Motion: Define Member

["Jamie Dallaire" <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx>]

Can we rewrite that motion? I realize now it's a bit redundant. A member who
does not hold a black sock ceases to be a member. A voting sockholder is a
member who holds at least one black sock. Why not just say a voting
sockholder is a member? Or just replace all mentions of voting sockholder
with member, or vice versa? Thye don't seem to be functionally different.

On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 4:59 PM, Tyler <wisety@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I mean, I vote FOR the Motion. Is there a difference?
>
> On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 2:58 PM, Tyler <wisety@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > I submit the following Motion for Black Corporation:
> > {
> > Change Paragraph 2 of the Articles of Incorporation from
> > "
> > 2. A Voting Sockholder is a Player who is a member of this contract and
> who
> > holds at least one Black sock. Any member of this contract which does not
> > hold at least one Black sock or is not a Player ceases to be a member of
> > this contract.
> > "
> >
> > to
> >
> > "
> > 2. A Player may become a member of this Contract only by means described
> in
> > this Contract, and a party to this Contract is not necessarily a member
> of
> > this Contract. Any member of this Contract who does not hold at least one
> > Black sock or is not a Player ceases to be a member of this Contract.
> >
> > A Voting Sockholder is a member of this contract who holds at least one
> > Black sock.
> > "
> >
> > }
> >
> > I vote for the above Motion.
> >
> > --
> >  -Tyler
> >
>
>
>
> --
>  -Tyler
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-business mailing list
> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
>
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss