Re: [s-d] [s-b] hostile takeovers

Jay Campbell on Wed, 1 Oct 2008 20:19:26 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] hostile takeovers

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] hostile takeovers
From: Jay Campbell <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2008 20:19:12 -0700
In-reply-to: <285c99840810011931s92e0435hf446ac0b165a735a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <48E41CC0.20105@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <285c99840810011931s92e0435hf446ac0b165a735a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914)

>
> Not valid. There are no outstanding socks of either color.
>   

I realized that after sending, but was hoping no one would notice that 
we never did the issuing. Or at least, the onus was on someone to refute 
it. Good reply, Charles.


_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] hostile takeovers
  - From: Charles Schaefer

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: For Landowners and Barons
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] spoonerism
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] hostile takeovers
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] hostile takeovers
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread