Justin Ahmann on Sat, 13 Sep 2008 15:51:03 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] Corporate tomfoolery |
The RecursionCorp Contract states that its Officer is a party. Codae ----- Original Message ---- From: Tyler <wisety@xxxxxxxxx> To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx> Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2008 6:49:05 PM Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Corporate tomfoolery No, non-parties can be officers, if I recollect correctly. I'm trying to see how Codae is still the officer now... On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 4:45 PM, Jamie Dallaire <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx>wrote: > But Codae's no longer a party, e.g. cannot be the officer, right? > > On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 6:42 PM, Elliott Hird < > penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > 2008/9/13 Tyler <wisety@xxxxxxxxx>: > > > Ok, so as officer of RecursionCorp, 0x44 owes Codae the Corporation's > m2. > > > Big deal, right? > > > > Codae is the officer, read carefully. > > _______________________________________________ > > spoon-discuss mailing list > > spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx > > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss > > > _______________________________________________ > spoon-discuss mailing list > spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss > -- -Tyler _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss