Tyler on Sat, 13 Sep 2008 15:50:21 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Corporate tomfoolery


Oh, right, but the Corporation says the Officer is the party...

On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 4:49 PM, Tyler <wisety@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> No, non-parties can be officers, if I recollect correctly. I'm trying to
> see how Codae is still the officer now...
>
>
> On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 4:45 PM, Jamie Dallaire <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>
>> But Codae's no longer a party, e.g. cannot be the officer, right?
>>
>> On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 6:42 PM, Elliott Hird <
>> penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> > 2008/9/13 Tyler <wisety@xxxxxxxxx>:
>> > > Ok, so as officer of RecursionCorp, 0x44 owes Codae the Corporation's
>> m2.
>> > > Big deal, right?
>> >
>> > Codae is the officer, read carefully.
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > spoon-discuss mailing list
>> > spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
>> > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> spoon-discuss mailing list
>> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
>> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
>>
>
>
>
> --
> -Tyler
>



-- 
-Tyler
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss