Tyler on Sat, 13 Sep 2008 15:50:21 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] Corporate tomfoolery |
Oh, right, but the Corporation says the Officer is the party... On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 4:49 PM, Tyler <wisety@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > No, non-parties can be officers, if I recollect correctly. I'm trying to > see how Codae is still the officer now... > > > On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 4:45 PM, Jamie Dallaire <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx>wrote: > >> But Codae's no longer a party, e.g. cannot be the officer, right? >> >> On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 6:42 PM, Elliott Hird < >> penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> > 2008/9/13 Tyler <wisety@xxxxxxxxx>: >> > > Ok, so as officer of RecursionCorp, 0x44 owes Codae the Corporation's >> m2. >> > > Big deal, right? >> > >> > Codae is the officer, read carefully. >> > _______________________________________________ >> > spoon-discuss mailing list >> > spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx >> > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss >> > >> _______________________________________________ >> spoon-discuss mailing list >> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx >> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss >> > > > > -- > -Tyler > -- -Tyler _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss