Re: [s-d] [s-b] Paradoxical registration

[Phil Ulrich <phil.ulrich@xxxxxxxxx>]

I was under the impression he was still a player, which means he can't 
become a Player because he's already a Human External Force who's a 
Player. Of course, if he quit at some point, then I'm mistaken (I'm 
clearly missing some emails, as I didn't get this email from Hose 
referenced below).

Tyler wrote:
> Huh? Why isn't it legal again for him to register? Is it because he has been
> a player recently? No, that can't be it. I don't get that your logic, Hose.
> 
> On 9/4/08, Mike McGann <mike.mcgann@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Fails.
>>
>> Rule 12 states:
>> "If it would be legal for the Outsider to take each Game Action within the
>> Transaction exactly as specified, and each assertion would be true at the
>> time it occurs within the list if the Game Actions were so taken, then the
>> Transaction is said to Succeed. Otherwise, the Transaction is said to
>> Fail."
>>
>> No matter what the assertion says, it is not legal to take the Game Action
>> as specified by Rule 4:
>>
>> "Any Human External Force who is not already a Player and who has not been
>> a
>> player in the current or previous nweek can become a Player by posting a
>> message to a Public Forum containing a request to become a Player and a
>> uniquely identifying name that e wishes to be known by."
>>
>> BEGIN TRANSACTION
>> Action: I request to register, under the name Hose.
>> Assertion: The Red Sox win the 2042 World Series.
>> END TRANSACTION
>>
>> - Hose
>> _______________________________________________
>> spoon-discuss mailing list
>> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
>> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
>>
> 
> 
> 
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss