Re: [s-d] [s-b] Rule precedence plan

["Mike McGann" <mike.mcgann@xxxxxxxxx>]

Not me. Current rule numbers have no significance and trying to retrofit
this would be difficult. Can you prove that the current numbering is
consistent with how precedence should work? Should rules 1-35 take
precedence over rule 36, "Rules"? And with the beast eating rules this
wouldn't be good either.

- Hose

On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 1:49 AM, Tyler Coleman <wisety@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I plan to propose a rule to change the never-used rule priority system in
> rule 75 to rule priority by number. Then lower numbered rules would take
> precedence. Who'll back me?
>
> --
> -Tyler Coleman
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-business mailing list
> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
>
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss