Jamie Dallaire on Sat, 26 Jul 2008 08:50:46 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] At 00:01 UTC, I publish the following ballot and turn the clock on: |
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 11:43 AM, Charles Schaefer <chuckles11489@xxxxxxxxx>wrote: > 2008/7/26, Jamie Dallaire <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx>: > > > > Hmmmm true that was discuss. Altho I am convinced I sent it some time > > around > > 7:45 e.g. 18 minutes before that time. Or maybe that's when I STARTED.... > > > You might have. I got it at 00:13 UTC. And I don't know (and am to lazy to > check) when it reached the list. The copy you sent to business was WAY > later > and yet still has the same alleged voting time on it. I'm not sure if that > would violate the TPD, but I'll count it anyway and if anyone disagrees > they > can challenge/consult/panic/etc. Man..... I'm a little tired still. Here's it goes again: RIGHT NOW, I Vote as follows: > > 469 (Remove): {{AGAINST}} [[I like the second part only.]] > 470 (Untitled Proposal (by MCTMike)): {{AGAINST}} [[cause I know I'll get > caught!]] > 471 (Registration Reform): {{FOR}}: [[Because it fixes the bonus exploit, > even though having no mechanism to reject new players based on suspected > non-distinct personhood, other than resorting to consultations after a new > player is already a player and has potentially already posed actions > (quantum states, anyone?) sounds emergency-licious.]] > 472 (Beat Inflation): {{FOR}} [[feed the poor. eat the rich.]] > 473 (this isn't Neopets): {{FOR}} [[even though I sort of wish this were > neopets.]] > 474 (Field Matches Without The Field): {{FOR}} > 475 (MinCorps): {{FOR}} > 476 (No More Nth Round Ballots): {{FOR}} [[even tho the incrementation bit > is a bit confusing.]] > 477 (Simplify Scoring): {{FOR}} [[Ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh. I just got that > removing the "if the proposal was ever won" bit means that we should in the > recent past have been getting 2 points per FOR vote on each proposal that > was passed. I remember this is how it used to work. Haven't we been getting > a single point per vote for recently?]] > 478 (Untitled Proposal (by Charles)): {{FOR}} > Billy Pilgrim _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss