Jamie Dallaire on Mon, 16 Jun 2008 07:34:35 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] 0x44's refresh proposal. |
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 10:30 AM, 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Jamie Dallaire wrote: > > Oh, also, I'm not sure the clock itself is a public display. If > everything > > we did since some bygone era is illegal/invalid, we might not be on nweek > > 145. Perhaps the RP should set the clock to nweek 145, nday 1, ndelay 0. > > > That's a good point, but if the clock isn't a public display, how can > any action dependent upon the clock be a public display? I don't think gamestate absolutely needs to be reflected in a public display to constitute gamestate and possibly influence other parts of the game. e.g. I don't have the habit as MoS of indicating on a PD when people have the Floating property. Yet they still do. _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss