Re: [s-d] [s-b] Answer to Consultation 120

Roger Hicks on Sun, 25 May 2008 20:42:50 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Answer to Consultation 120

To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Answer to Consultation 120
From: "Roger Hicks" <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 25 May 2008 21:42:32 -0600
In-reply-to: <44e5a2650805231336k20d4e34u53460a5bad747f2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <619952.85711.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <44e5a2650805231336k20d4e34u53460a5bad747f2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 2:36 PM, Jamie Dallaire
<bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I declare this Answer to be Consistent. If Equality for All passes, the part
> about amending 4E20 will simply fail, but that's ok.
>
Failed. You are the supplicant.

BobTHJ
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] ftw carnage - See Consultation 110
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Challenge
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Answer to Consultation 120
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread