Re: [s-d] [s-b] Answer to Consultation 120

Mike McGann on Sat, 24 May 2008 05:57:05 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Answer to Consultation 120

To: "discussion list for B Nomic" <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Answer to Consultation 120
From: "Mike McGann" <mike.mcgann@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 24 May 2008 08:57:02 -0400
In-reply-to: <BAY140-W5D8956D1D94907704B302FBC00@xxxxxxx>
References: <619952.85711.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <BAY140-W5D8956D1D94907704B302FBC00@xxxxxxx>

On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 7:50 AM, Lassi <lassi_4290@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I presume this means that I could have voted or if I had voted my votes would have
> been counted.

When in doubt, vote anyway.

- Hose
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Answer to Consultation 120
  - From: Lassi

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] My defense.
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Answer to Consultation 120
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Answer to Consultation 120
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread