Re: [s-d] [s-b] chess moves

Charles Schaefer on Mon, 19 May 2008 12:38:29 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] chess moves

To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] chess moves
From: "Charles Schaefer" <chuckles11489@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 12:38:22 -0700
In-reply-to: <4831D5C7.9020208@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <4831CD13.9080408@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <44e5a2650805191213k5930a0e0rcc1b1e569414a9a8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4831D5C7.9020208@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

2008/5/19, Jay Campbell <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
>
> > You will be prosecuted under anti-spam legislation. Fine of m100 :-)
> >
> I believe any member of the League at the time is bankrupt.


I disagree. The contract says we are "obligated to pay" enough points to
reduce the MoP's retainer to zero. The contract rule allows you to submit a
consultation if you believe we failed to fulfill our obligations, but until
then we keep our points.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Can WikiSpam!
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] chess moves
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] chess moves
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] chess moves
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread