Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Without Objection

Jay Campbell on Fri, 16 May 2008 19:21:10 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Without Objection

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Without Objection
From: Jay Campbell <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 19:23:04 -0700
In-reply-to: <6d741b990805161813l339dd5adlac126f7c5d4227a5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <285c99840805160627v27eb4534w678bdd1630e32f8d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <482D9D0A.4040408@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <cf0c2a990805160748g5d4f23bbla48460da1cc29ff8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <6d741b990805161151t686ea74qa5f07783c6562c09@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <6d741b990805161152m5077d72dle79cda4ec83d148c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <482DDA2F.5090401@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <cf0c2a990805161214p10d46252h741e9b84c0169f2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <285c99840805161221i5b355af1nf260df9fee72664c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <6d741b990805161324m1eb96fccpd49d2dab114128f8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <482DF49E.7010802@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <6d741b990805161813l339dd5adlac126f7c5d4227a5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Windows/20080421)

> I have no problems with contracts when used for their intended use.
> The Articles of Pancake, in my opinion, overstepped that. It was an
> attempt to create a mini-inter-nomic. 

I'm personally fascinated by the legal recursion of of systems like 
that, and by the interaction of different rulesets. I missed the Pancake 
stuff because it was winding down as I was winding up here but I wish 
I'd caught up enough to support it.

Like you, I'm behind the will of the group though, so I'll stop that 
horseplay if asked.

j

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Without Objection
  - From: Mike McGann

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Without Objection
  - From: 0x44
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Without Objection
  - From: Geoffrey Spear
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Without Objection
  - From: Mike McGann
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Without Objection
  - From: Mike McGann
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Without Objection
  - From: Jay Campbell
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Without Objection
  - From: Geoffrey Spear
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Without Objection
  - From: Charles Schaefer
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Without Objection
  - From: Mike McGann
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Without Objection
  - From: Jay Campbell
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Without Objection
  - From: Mike McGann

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] miner forty niner
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Without Objection
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Without Objection
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Without Objection
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread