Mike McGann on Fri, 16 May 2008 07:03:19 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Without Objection


On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 9:39 AM, Charles Schaefer
<chuckles11489@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> How about making it so a contract would need more support than objection
> after, say, 2 ndays?

Yeah, I would vote for that, but I do think we need to formalize what
"more support than objection" means in the Ruleset.

- Hose
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss