Charles Schaefer on Fri, 16 May 2008 06:40:00 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Without Objection |
How about making it so a contract would need more support than objection after, say, 2 ndays? 2008/5/16, Mike McGann <mike.mcgann@xxxxxxxxx>: > > On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 9:27 AM, Charles Schaefer > <chuckles11489@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I object to people objecting to perfectly good contracts. > > Contracts can be enacted through a proposal where everyone gets to > vote on it. I think allowing an objection in an out-of-band setting is > fine. Maybe a refinement where only players eligible to become parties > to the contract can object in the case of private contracts would be > nice. > > - Hose > _______________________________________________ > spoon-discuss mailing list > spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss