| ihope on Fri, 9 May 2008 13:49:11 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: [s-d] [s-b] Divine Injunction |
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 2:32 PM, Geoffrey Spear <geoffspear@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 2:05 PM, Roger Hicks <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>The >> Oracle may create a new Divine Injunction, or modify an existing >> Divine Injunction with two support. > > I think a comma before "with two support" is necessary, unless the > intent is to allow creation without support and only modification with > support. I think it would be best to say "With two support, the Oracle may . . .". --Ivan Hope CXXVII _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss