Re: [s-d] [s-b] Divine Injunction

["Geoffrey Spear" <geoffspear@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 2:05 PM, Roger Hicks <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>The
> Oracle may create a new Divine Injunction, or modify an existing
> Divine Injunction with two support.

I think a comma before "with two support" is necessary, unless the
intent is to allow creation without support and only modification with
support.

Actually, dropping the comma that's there is probably more correct and
would have the same effect as adding one, I think.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss