Mike McGann on Wed, 30 Apr 2008 15:17:09 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Tweaks |
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 8:53 AM, Geoffrey Spear <geoffspear@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > You did the work of compiling all that, why not just submit it as a > dependent proposal? I don't think dependent proposals should be used in this way. This is a refinement of an existing proposal, not a new distinct idea that, if it passes, requires an existing proposal to pass as well. We don't want to start something like: Proposal 20x6, Submitted by Player A {{ Reapl Rule 0 }} Proposal 20x7, Submitted by Player B {{ Dependency: Proposal 20x6 In Proposal 20x6, replace "Reapl" with "Repeal" }} - Hose _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss