Roger Hicks on Thu, 14 Feb 2008 13:54:17 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation: Beast voting

On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 7:41 AM, 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I answer Consultation 111, NO.
>  Reasoning:
>  I defer to Hose's reasoning with regard to the errant claim that the OCB
>  is a Registered Voter. I do believe that the rules should be amended to
>  permit certain game objects to vote, but that would exceed the bounds of
>  this Consultation.
>  Oracularity:
>     In Rule 4e71, strike the sentence "The OCB is also a Registered
>  Voter with a Vote Power of 1 as well as a COO and a DOO." Replacing it
>  with "The OCB is a COO and a DOO." In the list of Tricks the OCB is
>  capable of performing, set the Response values of the  "Vote For" and
>  "Vote Against" tricks to 0.
As of midnight UTC on Feb 14 this consultation became pondered and the
above Oracularity took effect.

spoon-discuss mailing list