Charles Schaefer on Tue, 12 Feb 2008 16:48:27 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation: Beast voting

Well without "take", "give" would have no effect since the Beast has no way
of getting macks, and opening up the possibility for COOs (or DOOs) to take
things could get messy. Maybe we should make the Beast an active non-player
entity (since there is a proposal to tie activity to taking game actions).

2008/2/12, 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> Charles Schaefer wrote:
> > I don't see what difference it would make by having seperated them. Each
> > trick still could have been supported or objected to individually.
> >
> You are less likely to receive objections to the "Give" trick, than the
> "Take" trick. My objection to the "Take" trick is only that there is no
> mechanism by which a COO can take currency from another.
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
spoon-discuss mailing list