Jamie Dallaire on Mon, 11 Feb 2008 20:53:58 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation: Beast voting |
On 2/11/08, Mike McGann <mike.mcgann@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Feb 10, 2008 9:41 AM, 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I answer Consultation 111, NO. > > I unofficially claim that I like this answer, I like the oracularity > for removing the two tricks but don't like that it will increase the > chance for a random rule destruction. I urge Hose to teach the beast some new less-dangerous tricks to decrease the likelihood of random rule destruction ;-) BP _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss