Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Fixing the Criminal Justice System

["Jamie Dallaire" <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx>]

Yes, I think this makes it neater. But can we have a default punishment
(min, max, mean of the two?) for when the priest neglects to assign a
punishment?

BP


On 2/11/08, Roger Hicks <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I submit the following proposal:
>
> Fixing the Criminal Justice System
> {
> Amend rule 4e54 to read:
> {{
> The rules may make certain Game Actions or gamestates involving a
> Player to be Crimes by defining them as one of the subcategories of
> Crimes--Felonies or Misdemeanors.
>
> A Player can be punished for a Criminal Action if he has been found
> guilty by a Consultation on a Question of his guilt for a particular
> action, which must be submitted no later than one nweek after the
> action in question was performed. If the Priest in the Consultation
> determines the player to be guilty, he shall as part of his
> Oracularity assign a punishment for the Crime. This punishment must
> accord with the minimum and maximum sentencing guidelines for the
> Crime in question.
>
> The Oracle cannot ZOT a question into his own guilt in a criminal matter.
>
> When not otherwise specified, the minimum punishment for a Misdemeanor
> shall be a fine of 1m and the maximum a fine of 50m.
>
> When not otherwise specified, the minimum punishment for a Felony
> shall be a fine of 25m and the maximum a fine of 500m.
> }}
> }
>
> This proposal simply consolidates the punishment for a crime into the
> Oracularity making this rule a lot cleaner.
>
> BobTHJ
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-business mailing list
> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
>
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss