Re: [s-d] [s-b] Two proposals

[Justin Ahmann <quesmarktion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Didn't we have a Proposal that did the exact opposite?

Codae

----- Original Message ----
From: Jamie Dallaire <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx>
To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2008 11:43:52 AM
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Two proposals

On Feb 10, 2008 2:08 AM, Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Proposal:  Instant Gratification
>
> Amend Rule 4E25 (Levels) by replacing this text:
>
>      On nday 1 of each nweek, each Player whose current Level is less
>      than the Level corresponding to his Points in the table below has
>      his Level set to the corresponding Level in the table. Each Player
>      whose current Level is higher than the Level corresponding to his
>      Points in the table below has his Level reduced by 1.
>
> with this text:
>
>      Whenever a Player's score changes, eir Level is set to the value
>      corresponding to his score in the table below.


What would be the point of even mentioning Levels? Anything that targets a
certain level could just target score instead?? Like your thor hammer mod
below.

Billy Pilgrim
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss