Re: [s-d] [s-b] proposal: B-Chess v1.2

["Jamie Dallaire" <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx>]

I agree that this would be neater and also leave more room for strategy.

I also consent (even though it's not required) to having Antonio revise the
proposal to include something like that despite the fact that i've already
moved to hurry it.

Are the others who've supported hurrying also ok with that? If so then I
think there wouldn't be any problem with Antonio revising.

On that note, I was thinking of submitting a proposal that would say that
once anyone has moved to hurry a proposal, it can't be revised anymore. But
then I could simply move to hurry any proposal that I don't like but is
likely to require edits.... We need to think about this some more... Maybe
restrict the initiation of hurrying to the author?

BP


On 2/5/08, Mike McGann <mike.mcgann@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I say now that we remove all randomness in placement and refactor to allow
> players to place their own starting King positions and to place any bought
> pieces. You can even make it so you have to place bought pieces before you
> even know what the piece is. I think it would be easier that way.
>
> - Hose
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
>
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss