Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposals: "The Beast" and "Random Rule Destruction"

ihope on Wed, 30 Jan 2008 08:18:32 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposals: "The Beast" and "Random Rule Destruction"

To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposals: "The Beast" and "Random Rule Destruction"
From: ihope <ihope127@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 10:18:29 -0500
In-reply-to: <44e5a2650801291646h41e011eeqb73d004e0b11082d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <44e5a2650801291646h41e011eeqb73d004e0b11082d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On 29/01/2008, Jamie Dallaire <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Create a new Rule, entitled "Operant Conditioning", that reads [[with the
> words between paired "==" representing section titles]]:

Why are you putting double brackets around something that affects the
game state?

--Ivan Hope CXXVII
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposals: "The Beast" and "Random Rule Destruction"
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: So we can win by paradox
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposals: "The Beast" and "Random Rule Destruction"
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Artificial Complements
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread