Roger Hicks on Wed, 30 Jan 2008 00:13:34 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposals: "The Beast" and "Random Rule Destruction" |
On Jan 29, 2008 9:56 PM, Jamie Dallaire <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > You mean you personally do not want to vote for this provision? Or are you > saying some people might? > I personally would not vote for the repeal of 4e13. Apart from that though I liked these proposals. > If you don't want to repeal rule 13, could you please explain :-) I'm not > quite sure what effect if any it can have when faced with the part of the > game objects rule that says you can't do anything to them unless explicitly > allowed? > 4e13 is broader than the 4e2. I'll leave it at that since I really don't want to get into the whole "permissible unless regulated" debate again. Plus, I'm really tired and can't think of any good examples now :) BobTHJ _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss