Re: [s-d] [s-b] Revise Proposal #321

0x44 on Mon, 28 Jan 2008 14:33:17 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Revise Proposal #321

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Revise Proposal #321
From: 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 15:32:10 -0600
In-reply-to: <6bf32280801281328m49d482efj147e8527ccfea22e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <56732cfd0801281208w600b0571xe2cec29e941a9d02@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <6bf32280801281328m49d482efj147e8527ccfea22e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.14pre (X11/20071023)

comex wrote:
> As a Game Action with 2 Support a Player may usurp a Ministry whose
> Retainer is less than or equal to 0.
Usurping doesn't require support anymore. You pay the point cost to take
the ministry. A ministry with a retainer of zero is a vacant Ministry.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Revise Proposal #321
  - From: comex

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Revise Proposal #321
  - From: comex

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation 2
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Revise Proposal #321
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Revise Proposal #321
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Revise Proposal #321
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread