Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation: Again the Rule

[0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Jamie Dallaire wrote:
> Another way to fix the paradox :-D
>
> I submit the following proposal, entitled "Big Voldy Style"
>
> {
> Create a rule with the following text:
> {{
> There is a Rule 4E41. The statement preceding the current statement takes
> precedence over all rules claiming otherwise.
>
> One second after this rule is created, replace the text of Rule 4E41 with
> the following:
> {{{
> There is a Rule 4E41, but it cannot be named.
>
> Any message to the Public Forum which refers to, mentions, or alludes to
> Rule 4E41, its title, or its contents, is disregarded and treated as if it
> had never reached the Public Forum.
>
> [[This applies to specific references to Rule 4E41 or to a block of text
> containing it, NOT to references to the Ruleset or Rules in general.]]
> }}}
>
> Two seconds after this rule is created, it is repealed.
> }}
>
>   
I would vote for this.

-- 
--
0x44;

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss