Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation: Again the Rule

Jamie Dallaire on Tue, 22 Jan 2008 01:20:12 +0100 (CET)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation: Again the Rule

To: "discussion list for B Nomic" <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation: Again the Rule
From: "Jamie Dallaire" <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 19:20:09 -0500
In-reply-to: <479535C4.5030909@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <6d741b990801211436h1f217480rc47176fab66d1afe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <479535C4.5030909@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Jan 21, 2008 7:16 PM, Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> How about the following?
>
> Create a rule with this text:
>
>       There is a Rule 4E41.  This takes precedence over all rules
>       claiming otherwise.
>
>       One second after this rule is created, both Rule 4E41 and
>       this rule are repealed.


Brilliant.

Billy Pilgrim
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation: Again the Rule
  - From: Ed Murphy

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation: Again the Rule
Next by Date: [s-d] RFC: War
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation: Again the Rule
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation: Again the Rule
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread