0x44 on Mon, 21 Jan 2008 14:41:48 +0100 (CET)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation: Criminal Case

0x44 wrote:
> Roger Hicks wrote:
>> On Jan 19, 2008 1:22 PM, Mike McGann <mike.mcgann@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> I hereby charge Codae with a Misdemeanor offense under Rule 59. I
>>> submit the following Consutlation:
>>> {{
>>> Is Codae guilty of violating Rule 59 for not updating the Public
>>> Display for the Ministry of Questions?
>>> Unbeliever: Codae
>>> }}
>>> Reasoning:
>>> Rule 18 states that the Oracle is responsible for maintaining a Public
>>> Display of the current Consultations. I interpret this to be an
>>> obligation of the Ministry, and a Minister shall fulfill any
>>> obligations as stated in Rule 53 which makes him liable under Rule 59.
>>> I bring this case forward, not because the duties were not performed
>>> in error or confusion, but because he willingly ducked these
>>> responsibilities as an "experiment". I recommend the maximum fine of
>>> m50, one point on his license, and two minutes in the penalty box.
> I answer this consultation NO. Rule 4e59 declares that spamming the fora 
> is a crime punishable by a maximum fine of 100m and any points they 
> would have received during the nweek.
Further, had you specified rule 4e54, I would have answered YES.


spoon-discuss mailing list