Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation: Criminal Case

Mike McGann on Sat, 19 Jan 2008 21:36:00 +0100 (CET)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation: Criminal Case

To: "discussion list for B Nomic" <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation: Criminal Case
From: "Mike McGann" <mike.mcgann@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 15:35:56 -0500
In-reply-to: <983157.34594.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <983157.34594.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Jan 19, 2008 3:30 PM, Justin Ahmann <quesmarktion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Whee!  A criminal case!
>
> Apart from the fact that I'm the defendent, I'd say that's a good thing.
>

I wanted to bring a case against the improper use of
nkeplwgplxgioyzjvtxjnncsqscvntlbdqromyeyvlhkjgteaqnneqgujjpwcbyfrpueoydjjk.
It wasn't conjugated properly as a verb, but there is no rule against
doing that.

- Hose
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation: Criminal Case
  - From: Justin Ahmann

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation: Criminal Case
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] [MoC] Ballot for nweek 137
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation: Criminal Case
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation: Criminal Case
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread