Re: [s-d] Question for the Referee

Mike McGann on Tue, 15 Jan 2008 23:27:23 +0100 (CET)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] Question for the Referee

To: "discussion list for B Nomic" <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] Question for the Referee
From: "Mike McGann" <mike.mcgann@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 17:27:17 -0500
In-reply-to: <478C50B2.2010002@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <44e5a2650801142115r8ec3888x7dea57b9bc81068b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <478C50B2.2010002@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Jan 15, 2008 1:20 AM, Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Incidentally, not that it should matter (per the above), but I think
> the Priority List is supposed to be in random order, since all 25
> cells were created simultaneously.

Or all the cells would have instantly disappeared in a puff of telefrag.

- Hose
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- [s-d] Question for the Referee
  - From: Jamie Dallaire
- Re: [s-d] Question for the Referee
  - From: Ed Murphy

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Various things
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] Question for the Referee
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] Question for the Referee
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] Question for the Referee
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread