Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation: the Field

[0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>
> Sure, but spherical geometry is a well-established field where the
> term "square" has a precise meaning.  I'd argue that the rules
> creating new fields of geometry implicitly is stretching things a bit.
>   
If this were a Mathnomic, I'd agree. Rule 57 clarifies what it means by
the default toroidal shape of the Field by stating that the squares
along the edges are adjacent to their opposite. Problem solved, we don't
need any freaky geometry to conceptualize the Field.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss